Amazon Web Services vs Microsoft Azure
GPU Pricing Comparison
| GPU | Amazon Web Services $/hr | Microsoft Azure $/hr | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| T4 | — | $0.53 | — |
| aws-inferentia2 | $0.76 | — | — |
| L4 | $0.80 | — | — |
| nvidia-a10 | — | $0.91 | — |
| A10G | $1.01 | — | — |
| A100 80GB PCIe | — | $7.35 | — |
| A100 80GB SXM | $32.77 | $29.36 | 10% with Microsoft Azure |
| H100 SXM | $98.32 | $98.32 | 0% with Microsoft Azure |
Feature Comparison
FeatureAmazon Web ServicesMicrosoft Azure
Provider TypeGPU CloudGPU Cloud
Billing Granularitysecondsecond
Autoscaling Yes Yes
SLA Uptime99.99%99.99%
Cold Start60s60s
Free Egress No No
Storage Cost$0.08/GB/mo$0.018/GB/mo
GPU Count13 offerings9 offerings
Models OfferedN/AN/A
Pros & Cons Summary
Amazon Web Services
Weaknesses
- -Higher GPU pricing than Microsoft Azure on most shared GPUs
Microsoft Azure
Strengths
- +Lower GPU pricing than Amazon Web Services on most shared GPUs
Compare Other Providers
Amazon Web Services vs RunPod→Amazon Web Services vs Google Cloud Platform→Amazon Web Services vs Lambda Labs→Amazon Web Services vs CoreWeave→Amazon Web Services vs Vast.ai→Amazon Web Services vs FluidStack→Microsoft Azure vs RunPod→Microsoft Azure vs Google Cloud Platform→Microsoft Azure vs Lambda Labs→Microsoft Azure vs CoreWeave→