Skip to content

GPU × use-case guide · Vision-language

Is the T4 a good GPU for vision-language?

The T4 is a turing NVIDIA GPU with 16 GB GDDR6 (300 GB/s), 65 TFLOPS BF16 / 65 TFLOPS FP8, and a 70 W TDP. Vision-language workloads care most about extra VRAM for the vision encoder and image tokens on top of the language model. Here's how the T4 measures up.

VRAM
16 GB
Bandwidth
300 GB/s
BF16
65 TFLOPS
Cheapest
$0.19/hr

What models fit on a single T4?

Weights only, reserving ~25% of the 16 GB for KV cache, activations and fragmentation. ✓ = fits on one card.

ModelBF16FP8INT4
Llama 3.1 8B
Qwen 2.5 14B
Gemma 2 27B
Mixtral 8x7B (MoE)
Llama 3.3 70B
Qwen 2.5 72B
Llama 3.1 405B

Largest single-card fit: none (needs multi-GPU) at BF16, Llama 3.1 8B at FP8, Qwen 2.5 14B at INT4. Bigger models need tensor-parallel across 8 cards.

T4 for vision-language, specifically

Vision-language is context-heavy, so the KV cache — not the weights — is what fills the 16 GB. On the T4 you'll trade context length against batch size: long prompts mean fewer concurrent requests. Because it runs offline, batch aggressively to push tokens-per-dollar down. Size it precisely on the calculator.

T4 pricing across providers

ProviderOn-demand $/hrReserved $/hr
tensordock$0.19
vast_ai$0.25
gcp$0.35$0.22
runpod$0.37
azure$0.45$0.28
aws$0.53$0.33

Verdict

At 16 GB, the T4 is a value card best suited to smaller vision-language models (up to Qwen 2.5 14B with INT4 quantisation). For larger models you'll want more VRAM or multi-GPU.

See full T4specs & pricing, size your model on the calculator, or compare every GPU on the GPU list.