GPU × use-case guide · Summarisation
Is the L40S a good GPU for summarisation?
The L40S is a ada NVIDIA GPU with 48 GB GDDR6 (864 GB/s), 362 TFLOPS BF16 / 733 TFLOPS FP8, and a 350 W TDP. Summarisation workloads care most about large context windows and batch throughput — documents are long and jobs run offline, so cost-per-token beats latency. Here's how the L40S measures up.
What models fit on a single L40S?
Weights only, reserving ~25% of the 48 GB for KV cache, activations and fragmentation. ✓ = fits on one card.
| Model | BF16 | FP8 | INT4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 8B | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Qwen 2.5 14B | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gemma 2 27B | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mixtral 8x7B (MoE) | — | — | ✓ |
| Llama 3.3 70B | — | — | ✓ |
| Qwen 2.5 72B | — | — | ✓ |
| Llama 3.1 405B | — | — | — |
Largest single-card fit: Qwen 2.5 14B at BF16, Gemma 2 27B at FP8, Qwen 2.5 72B at INT4. Bigger models need tensor-parallel across 8 cards.
L40S for summarisation, specifically
Summarisation is context-heavy, so the KV cache — not the weights — is what fills the 48 GB. On the L40S you'll trade context length against batch size: long prompts mean fewer concurrent requests. Because it runs offline, batch aggressively to push tokens-per-dollar down. Size it precisely on the calculator.
L40S pricing across providers
| Provider | On-demand $/hr | Reserved $/hr |
|---|---|---|
| fluidstack | $1.09 | — |
| tensordock | $1.19 | — |
| vast_ai | $1.29 | — |
| lambda | $1.59 | $1.19 |
| coreweave | $1.84 | $1.34 |
| runpod | $1.9 | — |
| gcp | $2.45 | $1.62 |
| aws | $2.56 | $1.69 |
Verdict
At 48 GB, the L40S is a solid mid-to-high-tier choice for summarisation: single-card up to Qwen 2.5 14B (BF16) or Gemma 2 27B (FP8), and cost-effective at ~$1.09/hr.
See full L40Sspecs & pricing, size your model on the calculator, or compare every GPU on the GPU list.