GPU × use-case guide · Summarisation
Is the H100 SXM a good GPU for summarisation?
The H100 SXM is a hopper NVIDIA GPU with 80 GB HBM3 (3350 GB/s), 990 TFLOPS BF16 / 1979 TFLOPS FP8, and a 700 W TDP. Summarisation workloads care most about large context windows and batch throughput — documents are long and jobs run offline, so cost-per-token beats latency. Here's how the H100 SXM measures up.
What models fit on a single H100 SXM?
Weights only, reserving ~25% of the 80 GB for KV cache, activations and fragmentation. ✓ = fits on one card.
| Model | BF16 | FP8 | INT4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 8B | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Qwen 2.5 14B | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gemma 2 27B | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mixtral 8x7B (MoE) | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Llama 3.3 70B | — | — | ✓ |
| Qwen 2.5 72B | — | — | ✓ |
| Llama 3.1 405B | — | — | — |
Largest single-card fit: Gemma 2 27B at BF16, Mixtral 8x7B (MoE) at FP8, Qwen 2.5 72B at INT4. Bigger models need tensor-parallel across 8 cards.
H100 SXM for summarisation, specifically
Summarisation is context-heavy, so the KV cache — not the weights — is what fills the 80 GB. On the H100 SXM you'll trade context length against batch size: long prompts mean fewer concurrent requests. Because it runs offline, batch aggressively to push tokens-per-dollar down. Size it precisely on the calculator.
H100 SXM pricing across providers
| Provider | On-demand $/hr | Reserved $/hr |
|---|---|---|
| lambda | $2.49 | $1.89 |
| fluidstack | $2.85 | — |
| tensordock | $3.29 | — |
| vast_ai | $3.4 | — |
| coreweave | $3.79 | $2.57 |
| runpod | $4.18 | — |
| gcp | $4.85 | $3.4 |
| azure | $4.98 | $3.49 |
| aws | $5.12 | $3.59 |
Verdict
With 80 GB, the H100 SXM is a data-center-class card that comfortably handles summarisation for models up to Gemma 2 27B at full precision on a single card — a strong pick if your budget supports ~$2.49/hr.
See full H100 SXMspecs & pricing, size your model on the calculator, or compare every GPU on the GPU list.