GPU × use-case guide · Speech-to-text
Is the A100 80GB PCIe a good GPU for speech-to-text?
The A100 80GB PCIe is a ampere NVIDIA GPU with 80 GB HBM2e (2039 GB/s), 312 TFLOPS BF16 / 312 TFLOPS FP8, and a 300 W TDP. Speech-to-text workloads care most about encoder throughput and real-time factor; models are small so mid-range cards are plenty. Here's how the A100 80GB PCIe measures up.
What models fit on a single A100 80GB PCIe?
Weights only, reserving ~25% of the 80 GB for KV cache, activations and fragmentation. ✓ = fits on one card.
| Model | BF16 | FP8 | INT4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 8B | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Qwen 2.5 14B | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gemma 2 27B | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mixtral 8x7B (MoE) | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Llama 3.3 70B | — | — | ✓ |
| Qwen 2.5 72B | — | — | ✓ |
| Llama 3.1 405B | — | — | — |
Largest single-card fit: Gemma 2 27B at BF16, Mixtral 8x7B (MoE) at FP8, Qwen 2.5 72B at INT4. Bigger models need tensor-parallel across 8 cards.
A100 80GB PCIe for speech-to-text, specifically
Speech-to-text is throughput-bound rather than VRAM-bound, so the A100 80GB PCIe's 2039 GB/s of bandwidth and 312 TFLOPS matter more than raw capacity. Because it's latency-sensitive, run it at low batch sizes on a fast framework (vLLM ≈ 85% MFU) rather than maximising batch. Size it precisely on the calculator.
A100 80GB PCIe pricing across providers
| Provider | On-demand $/hr | Reserved $/hr |
|---|---|---|
| fluidstack | $1.49 | — |
| tensordock | $1.59 | — |
| vast_ai | $1.6 | — |
| lambda | $1.79 | — |
| runpod | $2.29 | — |
Verdict
With 80 GB, the A100 80GB PCIe is a data-center-class card that comfortably handles speech-to-text for models up to Gemma 2 27B at full precision on a single card — a strong pick if your budget supports ~$1.49/hr.
See full A100 80GB PCIespecs & pricing, size your model on the calculator, or compare every GPU on the GPU list.