GPU × use-case guide · Reasoning / agentic
Is the L40 a good GPU for reasoning / agentic?
The L40 is a ada NVIDIA GPU with 48 GB GDDR6 (864 GB/s), 362 TFLOPS BF16 / 733 TFLOPS FP8, and a 300 W TDP. Reasoning / agentic workloads care most about long output generations (chain-of-thought), so decode throughput and KV-cache headroom dominate. Here's how the L40 measures up.
What models fit on a single L40?
Weights only, reserving ~25% of the 48 GB for KV cache, activations and fragmentation. ✓ = fits on one card.
| Model | BF16 | FP8 | INT4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 8B | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Qwen 2.5 14B | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gemma 2 27B | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mixtral 8x7B (MoE) | — | — | ✓ |
| Llama 3.3 70B | — | — | ✓ |
| Qwen 2.5 72B | — | — | ✓ |
| Llama 3.1 405B | — | — | — |
Largest single-card fit: Qwen 2.5 14B at BF16, Gemma 2 27B at FP8, Qwen 2.5 72B at INT4. Bigger models need tensor-parallel across 8 cards.
L40 for reasoning / agentic, specifically
Reasoning / agentic is context-heavy, so the KV cache — not the weights — is what fills the 48 GB. On the L40 you'll trade context length against batch size: long prompts mean fewer concurrent requests. Because it's latency-sensitive, run it at low batch sizes on a fast framework (vLLM ≈ 85% MFU) rather than maximising batch. Size it precisely on the calculator.
L40 pricing across providers
| Provider | On-demand $/hr | Reserved $/hr |
|---|---|---|
| tensordock | $0.99 | — |
| vast_ai | $1.09 | — |
| coreweave | $1.58 | $1.14 |
| runpod | $1.59 | — |
Verdict
At 48 GB, the L40 is a solid mid-to-high-tier choice for reasoning / agentic: single-card up to Qwen 2.5 14B (BF16) or Gemma 2 27B (FP8), and cost-effective at ~$0.99/hr.
See full L40specs & pricing, size your model on the calculator, or compare every GPU on the GPU list.