Skip to content

GPU × use-case guide · Code assistant

Is the T4 a good GPU for code assistant?

The T4 is a turing NVIDIA GPU with 16 GB GDDR6 (300 GB/s), 65 TFLOPS BF16 / 65 TFLOPS FP8, and a 70 W TDP. Code assistant workloads care most about low time-to-first-token and high single-stream tokens/sec, since developers wait on completions in real time. Here's how the T4 measures up.

VRAM
16 GB
Bandwidth
300 GB/s
BF16
65 TFLOPS
Cheapest
$0.19/hr

What models fit on a single T4?

Weights only, reserving ~25% of the 16 GB for KV cache, activations and fragmentation. ✓ = fits on one card.

ModelBF16FP8INT4
Llama 3.1 8B
Qwen 2.5 14B
Gemma 2 27B
Mixtral 8x7B (MoE)
Llama 3.3 70B
Qwen 2.5 72B
Llama 3.1 405B

Largest single-card fit: none (needs multi-GPU) at BF16, Llama 3.1 8B at FP8, Qwen 2.5 14B at INT4. Bigger models need tensor-parallel across 8 cards.

T4 for code assistant, specifically

Code assistant is context-heavy, so the KV cache — not the weights — is what fills the 16 GB. On the T4 you'll trade context length against batch size: long prompts mean fewer concurrent requests. Because it's latency-sensitive, run it at low batch sizes on a fast framework (vLLM ≈ 85% MFU) rather than maximising batch. Size it precisely on the calculator.

T4 pricing across providers

ProviderOn-demand $/hrReserved $/hr
tensordock$0.19
vast_ai$0.25
gcp$0.35$0.22
runpod$0.37
azure$0.45$0.28
aws$0.53$0.33

Verdict

At 16 GB, the T4 is a value card best suited to smaller code assistant models (up to Qwen 2.5 14B with INT4 quantisation). For larger models you'll want more VRAM or multi-GPU.

See full T4specs & pricing, size your model on the calculator, or compare every GPU on the GPU list.